Is a Verbal Contract Enforceable in California?

A verbal contract is generally enforceable in California with some exceptions. Two of several exception to enforcing verbal contracts are contracts that involves real estate leases, buying or selling real estate.

Brad Nakase, Attorney

Email  |  Call (888) 600-8654

Example Verbal Contract

Eliana has recently been applying for a new job. She finds a sales position in Sacramento, and after speaking with the employer, she is eager to work at their office. The employer, Ted, appears impressed with Eliana’s resume, and he promises her the job. Specifically, he says, “I really like your experience and attitude, and would love to work with you. Can you start on the fifth of next month?” Eliana happily agrees, and she moves her family from Los Angeles to Sacramento the next week. However, she then receives a call from Ted, who says, “Sorry, we found someone better suited for the position.” Eliana is shocked and feels betrayed. It sounded as though Ted had guaranteed her the job. She thought that they had effectively signed a verbal contract. She worries that because the promise was not made in writing, the employment contract is not enforceable. She wonders if verbal contracts are enforceable in the state of California.

What Is a Verbal Contract?

Though it may surprise residents of California, oral or verbal contracts are in many cases completely enforceable under state law. However, it is true that the California Civil Code is clear in prohibiting certain kinds of contracts from being sealed verbally. In those specific cases, the contracts must be in writing to be enforceable. That said, beyond those exceptions, which will be discussed in full below, verbal contracts may be enforced in the state of California.

The issue with verbal contracts is that the terms must be demonstrated by oral testimony instead of a written document. Often, individuals have difficulty recalling what was agreed, or they simply lie if it suits their purposes. The accepted rule is that it takes twice the time to prove the terms of a verbal contract than a written one, and costs three times as much to do so. So, due to its simplicity, a written contract is always preferred to a verbal contract.

Despite its drawbacks, there is nothing that prevents a verbal contract from being enforced. It is simply harder to prove. Only in certain circumstances are they prohibited in courts and not counted as a legitimate substitute for a written agreement. One should not confuse an oral contract’s ability to be enforced with the Parol Evidence Rule. This rule specified when verbal testimony can be used to prove or disprove a written agreement.

It is also important to remember another difference. “Express contracts,” as they are called, are verbally agreed upon contracts. “Implied contracts” are those assumed, or inferred, by the behavior of the involved parties. This difference is expressed in Civil Code Section 1619. For clarity, we will review the Code’s interpretation of the subject:

  • A contract is either express or implied.
  • An express contract is one, the terms of which are stated in words.
  • An implied contract is one, the existence and terms of which are manifested by conduct.

But how is conduct defined? This can be any action, or lack of action, that demonstrated to a court that an agreement was reached. An example of this would be if a person provided a contractor with the materials, tools, and access to his house for a construction job to be done. A typical oral contract would be if the person told the contractor what they intended to pay for the work, and the contractor agreed to the arrangement.

What Is the Basic Law of Oral Contracts?

Under California law, verbal contracts are permissible. Their legitimacy may be found in Civil Code Section 1622, as provided below:

  • All contracts may be oral, except such as are specially required by statute to be in writing.

Also, if an individual or party tricks another into not having a written contract, then an oral contract may be enforced. This is the case even if the contract in this situation should normally be in writing. This rule is enforced under Civil Code Section 1623, as quoted below:

  • Where a contract, which is required by law to be in writing, is prevented from being put into writing by the fraud of a party thereto, any other party who is by such fraud led to believe that it is in writing, and acts upon such belief to his prejudice, may enforce it against the fraudulent party.

As stated previously, there are some contracts that must be put in writing to be counted as legitimate. These specific types of contracts are listed in Civil Code Section 1624, as quoted below:

  • (a) The following contracts are invalid, unless they, or some note or memorandum thereof, are in writing and subscribed by the party to be charged or by the party’s agent:

  • An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed within a year from the making thereof.
  • A special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another, except in the cases provided for in Section 2794.

  • An agreement for the leasing for a longer period than one year, or for the sale of real property, or of an interest therein; such an agreement, if made by an agent of the party sought to be charged, is invalid, unless the authority of the agent is in writing, subscribed by the party sought to be charged.

  • An agreement authorizing or employing an agent, broker, or any other person to purchase or sell real estate, or to lease real estate for a longer period than one year, or to procure, introduce, or find a purchaser or seller of real estate or a lessee or lessor of real estate where the lease is for a longer period than one year, for compensation or a commission.

  • An agreement that by its terms is not to be performed during the lifetime of the promisor.

  • An agreement by a purchaser of real property to pay an indebtedness secured by a mortgage or deed of trust upon the property purchased, unless assumption of the indebtedness by the purchaser is specifically provided for in the conveyance of the property.

  • A contract, promise, undertaking, or commitment to loan money or to grant or extend credit, in an amount greater than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), not primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, made by a person engaged in the business of lending or arranging for the lending of money or extending credit.

What qualifies as personal, family, or household purposes? For this section of the law, one should understand a contract, promise, undertaking, or commitment to loan money secured solely by residential property to refer to one to four dwelling units.

The above law has a number of exceptions, which are typically received by special interests or market requirements. For example, verbal contracts are allowed in the sale of commodities and precious metals, as well as currency options. Subsection b of Section 1624 further address this issue, stating the following:

(1) An agreement or contract that is valid in other respects and is otherwise enforceable is not invalid for lack of a note, memorandum, or other writing and is enforceable by way of action or defense, provided that the agreement or contract is a qualified financial contract as defined in paragraph (2) and

(A) there is, as provided in paragraph (3), sufficient evidence to indicate that a contract has been made or

(B) the parties thereto by means of a prior or subsequent written contract, have agreed to be bound by the terms of the qualified financial contract from the time they reached agreement (by telephone, by exchange of electronic messages, or otherwise) on those terms.

(2) For purposes of this subdivision, a “qualified financial contract” means an agreement as to which each party thereto is other than a natural person and that is any of the following:

(A) For the purchase and sale of foreign exchange, foreign currency, bullion, coin or precious metals on a forward, spot, next-day value or other basis.

(B) A contract (other than a contract for the purchase of a commodity for future delivery on, or subject to the rules of, a contract market or board of trade) for the purchase, sale, or transfer of any commodity or any similar good, article, service, right, or interest that is presently or in the future becomes the subject of a dealing in the forward contract trade, or any product or byproduct thereof, with a maturity date more than two days after the date the contract is entered into.

(C) For the purchase and sale of currency, or interbank deposits denominated in United States dollars.

(D) For a currency option, currency swap, or cross-currency rate swap.

(E) For a commodity swap or a commodity option (other than an option contract traded on, or subject to the rules of a contract market or board of trade).

(F) For a rate swap, basis swap, forward rate transaction, or an interest rate option.

(G) For a security-index swap or option, or a security or securities price swap or option.

(H) An agreement that involves any other similar transaction relating to a price or index (including, without limitation, any transaction or agreement involving any combination of the foregoing, any cap, floor, collar, or similar transaction with respect to a rate, commodity price, commodity index, security or securities price, security index, other price index, or loan price).

(I) An option with respect to any of the foregoing.

To figure out whether the above exception applies to various kinds of transactions, one would be best advised to seek experienced legal advice. One should keep in mind that the above subsection of the Civil Code does not generally apply to the typical consumer.

Also, one should remember that this section of the Civil Code is constantly changing due to the advent of the internet. The law must learn how best to rule on the enforceability of contracts created via electronic methods. The internet affects every aspect of modern life, and many contracts are now made online. This fact changes the ancient notion of “in writing.” As a result, the following law has been passed in an attempt to address the problem:

Civil Code Section 1624

(3) There is sufficient evidence that a contract has been made in any of the following circumstances:

(A) There is evidence of an electronic communication (including, without limitation, the recording of a telephone call or the tangible written text produced by computer retrieval), admissible in evidence under the laws of this state, sufficient to indicate that in the communication a contract was made between the parties.

It should be noted that the parties’ actions after the verbal contract can enforce a contract that would normally have to be expressed in writing. In Civil Code Section 1624 (B), such a contract is enforceable if the following is true:

(B) … A confirmation in writing sufficient to indicate that a contract has been made between the parties and sufficient against the sender is received by the party against whom enforcement is sought no later than the fifth business day after the contract is made (or any other period of time that the parties may agree in writing) and the sender does not receive, on or before the third business day after receipt (or the other period of time that the parties may agree in writing), written objection to a material term of the confirmation. For purposes of this subparagraph, a confirmation or an objection thereto is received at the time there has been an actual receipt by an individual responsible for the transaction or, if earlier, at the time there has been constructive receipt, which is the time actual receipt by that individual would have occurred if the receiving party, as an organization, had exercised reasonable diligence. For the purposes of this subparagraph, a “business day” is a day on which both parties are open and transacting business of the kind involved in that qualified financial contract that is the subject of confirmation.

If one of the parties admits that a contract was indeed made, then it is not necessary to have it in writing. This is expressed in Civil Code Section 1624 (C):

(C) The party against whom enforcement is sought admits in its pleading, testimony, or otherwise in court that a contract was made.

Finally, a piece of writing that is not included in a contract but has been signed by the individual or party denying it, may form a legitimate contract even if the original contract was verbal. This rule is expressed in Civil Section 1624 (D), printed as follows:

(D) There is a note, memorandum, or other writing sufficient to indicate that a contract has been made, signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by its authorized agent or broker.

The above law has also lessened the amount of information that is needed for electronic communications to form a written contract. Civil Code Section 1624 expresses this rule as follows:

For purposes of this paragraph, evidence of an electronic communication indicating the making in that communication of a contract, or a confirmation, admission, note, memorandum, or writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states one or more material terms agreed upon, as long as the evidence provides a reasonable basis for concluding that a contract was made.

This law now goes even further, allowing for electronic signatures on forms to create a written binding contract. This is similar to the Federal Law on the same issue. As expressed by Civil Code Section 1624 (4), it allows for computer information to be made into a written contract:

CC 1624 (4) For purposes of this subdivision, the tangible written text produced by telex, telefacsimile, computer retrieval, or other process by which electronic signals are transmitted by telephone or otherwise shall constitute a writing, and any symbol executed or adopted by a party with the present intention to authenticate a writing shall constitute a signing.


The quoted sections of the California Civil Code above are only a fraction of the laws related to the enforcement of contracts. Regardless, if an individual or party believes that a binding verbal agreement was at any point made, then he or she would be advised to see experienced legal counsel. A lawyer will be able to determine whether there is a case to be made.

California courts do not like fraud, and they are more likely to enforce a contract if they feel that one party fooled the other into believing a promise.

That said, written contracts are always best, due to the difficult of proving a verbal contract. Therefore, the best advice is to always try to get agreements in writing. But do not despair id you cannot and are left with only a verbal agreement. In this case, there is recourse, and an oral contract may be legally enforced.

Please tell us your story:

1 + 6 = ?

See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment

What Is a Gap Analysis

What is a Gap analysis?

Gap analysis helps businesses compare current performance with desired goals, identifying inefficiencies. This method aids in developing action plans to bridge performance gaps.
SWOT Analysis Example

SWOT Analysis Example

Conducting an HR SWOT analysis helps identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats within and external to an organization. This process aids in developing strategic HR actions aligned with the company's objectives.

Costco Hot Dog Price Story

The story about Costco $1.50 hot dog price began in 1993 when the Costco merged with Price Club. Costco's $1.50 hot dog price remains unchanged in 2024.

Request for Production of Documents, RPOD, CCP 2031.280

Starting January 1, 2020, California's civil litigants face stricter discovery rules under Cal. Civ. Pro. § 2031.280(a). All produced documents must now be labeled by request number, impacting both new and ongoing cases.
What is a default judgment

What is a default judgment

A default judgment is issued when a defendant fails to respond to a lawsuit, allowing the plaintiff to win by default. Understanding this process is crucial for both parties involved in litigation.
What is a quitclaim deed

What is a quitclaim deed

Quitclaim deeds offer a quick way to transfer property ownership without guarantees, distinct from warranty deeds. Ideal for non-sale property transfers among family or into trusts, they require careful legal consideration.
Sole Proprietorship Business License

Sole Proprietorship Business License

Sole proprietorships offer simplicity and fewer formalities for new business owners, with benefits like no separate taxes. Remember, personal and business assets aren't distinct, impacting liabilities and the need for proper licensing.
What is the most important part of your business plan

What is the most important part of your business plan

The executive summary shines as the pivotal element of a business plan, serving as a decisive factor for readers to delve deeper. A comprehensive guide on crafting an impactful business plan, focusing on unique strategies and essential components.
Easy Businesses To Start

Easy Businesses To Start

Unleash your entrepreneurial spirit with these straightforward home-based business ideas, from e-commerce to creative pursuits. Embrace the flexibility and potential for financial independence with diverse options suited for various interests and investment levels.
What is the standard deduction

What is the standard deduction

Understand the IRS standard deduction, a straightforward option for reducing taxable income without needing detailed documentation. Delve into eligibility, amounts for 2023-2024, and considerations for itemizing versus standard deduction.
How to get a business license

How to get a business license

Grasp the essentials of obtaining a business license in California, focusing on local and state-level requirements. Uncover specifics on when and why different types of business licenses are needed.
Why Do Businesses Fail

Why Do Businesses Fail?

Uncover the key factors contributing to small business challenges, including financial obstacles, inadequate management, and flawed marketing strategies. Understand the role of a comprehensive business plan in ensuring long-term success.
What is a BOC 3

What is a BOC 3

Understand the essentials of a BOC-3 filing for transportation businesses in California, detailing the designation of process agents for FMCSA certification. Learn the requirements, costs, and benefits of choosing the right process agent for your business.
Standard deduction vs itemized deduction

Standard Deduction vs Itemized Deduction

Understand the key differences between standard and itemized deductions to effectively reduce your taxable income and potentially save on taxes. Choose wisely to maximize your tax benefits based on personal financial details.
How to calculate net income

How to calculate net income

Unveil the significance of calculating net income for business profitability, a key indicator for financial health and decision-making. Understand the formula and practical applications for determining net earnings.
Itemized deductions

Itemized Deductions: What they mean on a tax return

Optimize your tax return by understanding the differences between itemized and standard deductions, crucial for minimizing tax liability. Learn the benefits and challenges of itemizing to make informed financial decisions.
What are intangible assets

What Are Intangible Assets

Discover the value of intangible assets like patents and trademarks in your business, crucial for strategic and financial planning. Learn how to manage and amortize these non-physical yet essential resources.
What is accounting

What Is Accounting

Understand the importance of accounting in monitoring financial activities and making informed decisions for your business. Gain insight into accounting fundamentals and its role in legal and tax matters.
Dysfunctional family

Dysfunctional Family: Key traits and impacts

Explore the impact of growing up in a dysfunctional family, where constant conflict, neglect, and various addictions shape childhood experiences. Understand common traits, the consequences on children, and the cycle of unhealthy parenting behaviors.
When Was the Great Recession

When Was the Great Recession?

Delve into the Great Recession's timeline, an era of financial distress from December 2007 to June 2009. Understand the causes, including the 2007 housing bubble crash, and worldwide effects.
When Was the Last Recession in the US

When Was the Last Recession in the US?

Review discussions on America's most recent downturn, comparing the impacts and definitions of Covid-19 and the Great Recession. Analyze the significant effects of past economic crises on US policy and business approaches.
What to Invest in During a Recession- 4 Ideas

What to Invest in During a Recession: 4 Ideas

Uncover effective strategies for investing during a recession, assessing personal goals and current market situations. Examine four robust investment approaches to manage through economic declines effectively.
Will the US Get Hit with a Recession in 2024

Will the US Get Hit with a Recession in 2024?

Experts debate the likelihood of a 2024 US recession, analyzing factors like the yield curve and consumer confidence. Predictions vary, with a focus on interest rates and tech layoffs impacting the economy's future.
How Long Do Recessions Last

How Long Do Recessions Last?

Learn about typical US recession lengths and influencing factors, noting recent trends with shorter durations averaging 10 months. Investigate how external factors and government decisions affect recession timelines, comparing historical data.
When Will the Recession End

When Will the Recession End?

Economists predict a mild US recession with limited impact on employment and spending. The duration and impact of the recession depend on Federal Reserve policies and business cycle patterns.

See all blog: Business | Corporate | Employment

© Copyright | Nakase Law Firm (2019)