California Class Action Lawsuit Lawyer

Brad Nakase, Attorney

Email | Tel 888-600-8654

A class action lawsuits are often filed against big companies whose negligence has harmed a large group of people. A class action lawsuit includes many topics; the most common being employment law class action lawsuit or defective product class action lawsuits. Although there are many California class action lawyers, it is important to select a class action attorney that is familiar with the local courts. In a class action, the court must approve the class action lawyer as the class representative. I’m a class action lawyer Los Angeles courts are familiar with. I’ve also acted as a California class action lawyer in San Diego courts, and Orange County courts.

Free Consultation

Call (888) 600-8654

What Is a Class Action Lawsuit?

A class action lawsuit is when a group of injured parties band together to file a lawsuit as a group (called a class) instead of filing individual lawsuits. There is no requirement for how many people must join the lawsuit, it can be as big as needed; the only requirement is that everyone has at least one common injury. The class is represented by a class action lawyer.

For example, a company misclassifies its employees as independent contractors, meaning they missed out on benefits. Some may have also been wrongfully terminated, and some may have missed out on sick pay or maternity leave, but the issue they all have in common is the misclassification. Therefore, the class action lawsuit is filed for misclassification. Once that lawsuit has been concluded, the members of the class who had additional grievances would file lawsuits for those too. Learn more: What is a class action lawsuit

A class action lawsuit is an extremely efficient way to handle a complaint that affects other people. It will capture attention much more than a small lawsuit will, and the company and their lawyers will take it much more seriously. Also, unless you’re the lead plaintiff, you can take a very passive role in the class action lawsuit and just wait for the updates. Most class action lawsuits are handled on a contingency basis, so the California class action lawyer compensated a fee that is approved by the court. If they do not win, you do not have to pay the class action attorney. Therefore, a class action lawsuit is a much more efficient way to handle minor claims. The State of California published a study of California Class Action Litigation.

The California Department of Health Care Services’ (DHCS) Class Action Recovery Program seeks reimbursement for services that Medi-Cal paid for on behalf of its members who are involved in third party actions, such as product liability, vaccine/ medication-related injuries, and exposure to asbestos/ other environmental toxins.

How Does a Class Action Lawsuit Work?

A group of people notice that they are dealing with the same issue. In the example we gave, one employee may realize that they are being misclassified, as are some of their colleagues. They join a group and speak to an attorney who agrees they have a case and would be able to file a class action lawsuit. The members of the class will then pick a lead plaintiff who will act as the representative between the attorney and the rest of the class. If a class action lawsuit ends up being 50 people, for example, it is impractical to try and organize a meeting for all those people. Therefore, the lead plaintiff meets with the attorney and relays information to the members of the class.

A California class action lawyer will then file the lawsuit with the court and petition to be recognized as a class. Once they receive approval to form a class, the attorney can then bring additional people into the class action lawsuit. For example, the original class may be people in one department in a big corporation, but they know that other departments may face misclassification too. Once they have been recognized as a class, they can ask people from other departments to join the class action lawsuit.

FAQ

What is a Class Action Lawsuit?

Understanding Ex Parte Motions: Common Questions Answered

Ex parte motions address urgent legal issues requiring immediate court action without full notice. Proper use ensures fairness, while misuse risks sanctions, delays, and damage to a party's credibility.

Breach of Contract Law in California

To recover damages from the defendant for breach of contract in California, the plaintiff must prove all of the following: (1) that plaintiff and defendant entered into a valid contract; (2) that plaintiff performed under the contract or that performance was excused; (3) that the defendant failed to perform under the contract; (4) that plaintiff was harmed; and (5) that defendant’s breach of contract was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s harm.

Mediation: Is virtual or zoom or in person mediation better?

This article examines the benefits and drawbacks of in-person and Zoom mediation, helping legal professionals choose the best method for their cases.

ENE Court Hearing: What is it and how does it work?

The article discusses the purpose, process, and key aspects of Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) hearings in court proceedings.

How To Make A Motion To Compel Discovery Responses

This article provides a detailed guide on the process for filing a motion to compel discovery.

Types of Brackets for Mediation Settlement

Understanding and effectively utilizing different types of brackets in mediation can be the key to achieving successful settlements.

What is privileged information in discovery?

Learn when to assert privilege in discovery and when to compel discovery when a party asserts privilege.

Understanding Discovery: Scope of Admissible Evidence

The term "Reasonably Calculated to Lead to Discovery of Admissible Evidence" defines the scope of permissible discovery in legal proceedings, focusing on information that could lead to trial-admissible evidence. The discovery process is applied liberally, allowing for a broad range of information, including hearsay, stipulated matters, and cumulative evidence, to be gathered.

Discovery Limitations in California

Learn the key restrictions on legal discovery in California with our concise guide on CCP-imposed limits. Learn how timing, scope, and protective orders shape the discovery process in California civil cases.

Right to Discovery in California: No Leave of Court

In California legal proceedings, most discovery procedures are available as a matter of right without requiring leave of court, except for certain sensitive matters such as physical and mental examinations, a defendant's financial condition in punitive damage cases, and a plaintiff's sexual history in sexual harassment cases, which require a court order.

Motion To Quash Subpoena for Business Records and Grounds

A party to the lawsuit may file a motion to quash if their consumer records, employment records, or “personally identifying information” are contained in the documents sought by the subpoena.

Special Damages vs. General Damages: What’s the Difference?

General damages, including pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and emotional trauma, arise naturally from a wrongdoing and aren't quantified monetarily. In contrast, tort law's special damages, like car repairs or medical bills, are calculable and differ from general damages that lack a fixed cost.

Motion To Compel Arbitration

This article discusses the legal intricacies and procedures related to filing a motion to compel arbitration, covering topics such as tolling provisions, consolidation of arbitration proceedings, and appeals. The conversation provided a detailed overview of strategies for both enforcing and avoiding a motion to compel arbitration in various legal contexts.

Pleading the Fifth In A Civil Case

A defendant or witnesses in a civil case may plead the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The person pleading the fifth must show that there is a real possibility that the information sought can be use against them in a pending or future criminal case.

Mastering the Art of Trial Preparation: Trial Preparation Checklist

This article discusses strategies for legal teams, emphasizing meticulous evidence analysis, effective storytelling, and leveraging modern technology for case organization. It highlights the significance of detailed planning, from crafting compelling narratives to adopting trial prep software, ensuring every case aspect is methodically documented and presented.

Mastering the Courtroom: Essential Tips for Trial Lawyers

This article serves as tips for trial lawyers, offering valuable strategies for effective courtroom practice. It emphasizes the importance of meticulous preparation, persuasive communication, and strategic decision-making, especially when going to trial.