California does not have a fixed definition of full-time employment, but federal guidelines set thresholds between 30 and 40 hours weekly. Full-time status impacts benefits, overtime eligibility, and legal protections, with employer policies differing based on industry and regulations.
By Brad Nakase, Attorney
Email | Call (888) 600-8654
Have a quick question? I answered nearly 1500 FAQs.
A large percentage of Americans’ lives are spent at work. The average full-time worker puts in about 71% of a year at the office, according to USA Today. That works out to around 2,080 hours per year for people who clock in five days a week.
However, exactly what is a “full-time” worker? Is there a universally accepted definition of “full-time” employment? And why is this important? To find out the answers to these and other questions, continue reading.
A lot of people think that if someone says they work full-time, they mean forty hours a week. Different sources may use different language when describing what constitutes a full-time employee. Let’s get a better look.
An individual is considered to be working full-time by the IRS if they put in a minimum of thirty hours per week, or one hundred and thirty hours each month. There are two ways that the IRS can tell if someone is working full-time:
Conversely, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, anyone putting in more than 35 hours per week is considered to be working full-time. Like the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Affordable Care Act (ACA) uses thirty hours as the standard for full-time employment.
There is a lot of room for interpretation when it comes to what constitutes full-time employment, even though federal regulations provide some direction. Working eight hours per day, five days per week, for a total of forty hours has traditionally been considered full-time. The exact language matters because it usually determines the minimum requirement to be eligible for full-time benefits, but every employer has the right to come up with its own definition.
The standard definition of a part-time worker is someone who does not fulfill the “full-time” requirements set by their employer. A number of nations have passed legislation to shield part-timers from discrimination in the workplace.
In the United States, that is not the case at the moment; however, Senator Elizabeth Warren is working on a bill to change regulations regarding part-time workers’ rights to employment, leave, and pensions. For instance, it suggests doing away with the requirement that part-time employees work a certain number of hours before they are eligible for family and medical leave.
When comparing part-time and full-time workers, one important distinction is whether or not they are eligible for benefits. In most companies, full-time employees are eligible for all benefits, while part-timers may only get partial coverage or be ineligible altogether. As an illustration, a company that employs full-timers may provide them with 20 vacation days, while part-timers who put in 50% of the time might only get 10. When it comes to claims of discrimination, this proration gives employers the protection they need with its “objective justification” defense.
Some of the more typical benefits offered by American employers are as follows:
From time to time, employees may be required to put in extra time beyond their regular schedules. Depending on the laws in your state and the federal government, you might be eligible for overtime pay for those extra hours worked.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) divides workers into two categories: those who are exempt from overtime pay and those who are not. If a nonexempt worker puts in more than 40 hours in a workweek, they are eligible for overtime pay, typically calculated at time and a half. Those workers who are considered exempt from overtime pay are usually those who receive a salary.
The management of both full- and part-time employees imposes a plethora of legal and regulatory obligations on employers. Some examples of these are:
Laws pertaining to minimum wage, overtime, and timekeeping: laws governing the classification of employees, outlining the differences between part-time and full-time workers and who is exempt from these classifications
Benefit compliance ensures that plans meet the requirements of various laws and regulations, including those pertaining to health care, employment, diversity, anti-discrimination, workplace safety (as outlined by OSHA), mandatory meal and rest breaks, unemployment insurance, worker’s compensation, and more
Workers also have the right to sue their employers for negligent misrepresentation and fraudulent inducement if they make false promises or release misleading statements. An employee may file a lawsuit if, for instance, their employer routinely promises them overtime pay but then fails to pay them or if their manager fails to promote them to full-time after a reasonable amount of time has passed.
It is not required that these commitments be in writing; verbal or meeting-based forms will suffice. In general, employees can sue for false representation if they have enough evidence, although this might vary depending on the state’s labor laws, employment-at-will regulations, fraud claim rules, and individual legal rights.
Differentiating between part-time and full-time employees requires precise time tracking. Accurate payroll processing, benefits administration, and adherence to labor regulations are just a few of the many additional benefits of time tracking. Software that accurately categorizes workers, gives them access to their own schedules at any time, and lets them request, track, and modify PTO might also help operations run more smoothly. In addition to improving overall productivity, creating comprehensive reports and analyzing the data effectively tracks hours.
Working a full-time job might mean different things in different countries and according to different industries. The standard definition of full-time employment in many countries, especially the United States, is 35 to 40 hours per week. When it comes to benefits like health insurance and paid time off, though, some employers may consider 30 hours a week full-time.
While federal regulations and industry standards generally serve as guides, California law does not provide a precise definition of full-time employment. Forty hours per week is the standard for full-time employment. Employers may treat workers who put in 30 or more hours per week as full-timers for the purposes of benefits like health insurance.
Although full-time employees are not necessarily required to receive benefits by law, the size of the employer does determine which benefits are mandatory. Health insurance for workers putting in 30 or more hours per week is a requirement of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for companies with 50 or more full-time employees. Paid time off (PTO) is not mandated by law, but many employers provide it as a perk to entice and keep employees.
Overtime compensation is not payable to employees who are considered exempt from the overtime pay law, even if their workweek exceeds the federal 40-hour limit. These employees usually hold positions of management, executive, administrative, professional, or specialty. This means that exempt employees receive a fixed salary no matter how many hours they work.
Federal law mandates that nonexempt workers receive overtime compensation for any hours worked beyond 40 per week, with that compensation varying according to the employee’s actual weekly hours worked.
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment Law
Most recent blogs:
Contact our attorney.