What Does False Imprisonment Mean?

False imprisonment in California involves unlawfully restraining someone without consent, even briefly, and can lead to criminal charges. This article covers legal definitions, common defenses, and misdemeanor or felony penalties under Penal Code 236.

By Brad Nakase, Attorney

Email  |  Call (888) 600-8654

Have a quick question? I answered nearly 1500 FAQs.

Introduction

False imprisonment is the deliberate, non-consensual detention of an individual without a valid reason for a significant period of time (doesn’t matter how brief) that results in harm to the plaintiff (California Penal Code Section 236 PC). The maximum prison term is three years.

Examples

  • Grasping the spouse by the shoulders over an argument. Preventing her from exiting a room.
  • Confining someone within a closet.
  • A police officer making an arrest & holding a subject without a court order/warrant.

Defenses

Criminal defense attorneys use numerous defense techniques to refute false incarceration accusations. A few of them are:

  • You were able to restrain the purported victim legally.
  • The “victim” agreed to be imprisoned.
  • You were defending yourself.
  • The shopkeeper’s privilege is applicable.
  • You were using the parental rights.

Penalties

Infractions of Section 236 PC can be considered misdemeanors.

Penalties are:

  • A maximum punishment of $1,000
  • A year in county prison.

The prosecutor may charge the offense as a felony if you used menace, violence, deceit, or fraud to restrict someone.

False imprisonment is a felony. A prison sentence of up to 3 years could be given.

False Imprisonment Explained

Two types of wrongful imprisonment are defined by California’s wrongful imprisonment laws. Among them are:

  • Misdemeanor false imprisonment.
  • Felony false imprisonment.

1. Misdemeanor false imprisonment

The prosecution must establish some elements to effectively prosecute you.

  • You purposefully & illegally confined, detained, or restrained someone.
  • That person was forced to stay or go somewhere against their choice by your actions.

Example: Patty and Harry are a married couple. They are fighting in their vehicle. Harry tries to flee. Patty activates the child’s lock. It prevents him from doing so.

This is considered misdemeanor false imprisonment because Harry’s freedom of mobility is taken away from him against his will. Patty might still be charged for the brief period of time she kept Harry in the vehicle against his will. This is irrespective of her opening the door within a few seconds.

2. Felony false imprisonment

The prosecution must demonstrate some things to obtain a conviction.

  • You purposefully & illegally used violence, threats, fraud, or deceit. The aim was to confine, constrain, or detain someone.
  • You forced them to stay or go somewhere against their will.

Both fraud & deceit entail deliberate misrepresentations. They are extremely similar. Although both of these phrases are frequently used in tandem, the Penal Code does not define each one separately. Nevertheless, the majority of the time, fraud is a form of deliberate deception that causes the victim to rely on the offender (i.e., the victim accepts the offender’s distortion and acts in line with that belief), whereas deceit does not.

Some useful definitions.

  • The action is considered to be “against their will” if a person does not provide their consent. A person must behave voluntarily and freely and be aware of the essence of the act to be able to provide their consent.
  • Using more physical force than is properly required to restrain someone is referred to as “violence.” Domestic violence is a type of violence.
  • A physical or verbal threat of violence. This includes the use of a lethal weapon. It is referred to as a “menace.” There may be an explicit/implicit threat of danger.

Example: Patty & Harry, a married couple, are fighting at home. When Harry tries to leave, Patty threatens to shoot him, so Harry remains put. Because Patty employed “menace” to limit Harry’s freedom, this is considered felony false imprisonment.

Keep in mind that the individual being restrained doesn’t have to be imprisoned in a state prison or jail for California false imprisonment to occur. Anywhere is a potential site for false incarceration.

False imprisonment is a crime with a general aim. You can be convicted of this crime even if you never intended to imprison anyone illegally.

Example: Beth tells Ben that there has been a chemical attack as a practical joke. They spend several hours hiding in Beth’s basement. Although Beth’s deception led Ben to believe it was dangerous to leave, she never planned to imprison him against his will. Beth may therefore be charged with California false imprisonment.

Must Read: Background Check Laws in California: Regulations Employers Must Follow

Common Defenses

You can raise a legal defense to refute a false imprisonment charge.

Among the typical defenses are:

  • Legal power to restrict.
  • Consent.
  • Self-protection.
  • Shopkeeper’s privilege.
  • Rights of parents.

1. Legal power to restrict

Police officers or other law enforcement authorities commonly raise this defense in cases of wrongful imprisonment involving illegal arrests and detention. There is the possibility of no false incarceration if you are legally able to restrain someone.

For instance, if a police officer stops and apprehends someone in accordance with a legitimate arrest warrant, he will not be charged under PC 236.

A civilian may occasionally be able to use a valid citizen’s arrest to restrain someone else.

In California, you have the right to “detain” someone you witness committing a crime until police arrive by taking the proper, legal, and reasonable actions. This is referred to as a “citizen’s arrest.” The following circumstances allow a private individual to make an arrest according to California Penal Code 837.

2. Consent

You need to demonstrate that the alleged victim was there willingly and gave their consent. It is always a legitimate defense.

Evidence that can be used to show consent:

  • Recordings of audio or video.
  • Written correspondence (including emails and texts)
  • Eyewitness account.

You shouldn’t be found guilty of California false imprisonment if it can be demonstrated that you didn’t “force” the victim to be there and that they weren’t being held against their will.

3. Self-defense

If you rationally hold the belief in good faith that you or others are going to suffer immediate or serious bodily harm, California law permits you to use proportionate measures in defense of self and others.

If the victim had threatened self-harm or suicide, you may claim “defense of others” if you put them in a place where they couldn’t damage themselves (and you subsequently called for assistance as soon as possible).

For instance, you shouldn’t be found guilty of California false imprisonment for detaining your spouse if they made remarks that made you think they were going to kill themselves or harm someone else.

4. Shopkeeper’s privilege

Store owners & shopkeepers who have a reasonable suspicion that a customer has committed shoplifting may raise this argument. You have the right to hold the suspect while you conduct an investigation. The investigation needs to be conducted in an appropriate way and for a reasonable amount of time.

The details of a particular case will establish the “reasonableness.”

5. Parental Rights

It is legal for parents to reprimand their kids by methods that limit their mobility. “Grounding” them or enforcing “timeouts.”

You can legally restrict your kids against their will as long as they don’t suffer undue pain or damage. It guarantees that you aren’t operating maliciously or with criminal intent.

Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.

See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment Law

Most recent blogs:

What does false imprisonment mean

What Does False Imprisonment Mean?

False imprisonment in California involves unlawfully restraining someone without consent, even briefly, and can lead to criminal charges. This article covers legal definitions, common defenses, and misdemeanor or felony penalties under Penal Code 236.

Unjust Enrichment California Law Definition Elements & Defenses

A cause of action for unjust enrichment arises wherever there is a benefit received by one party at the cost of another. Unjust enrichment in California is based on the principle that one party should not be allowed to unjustly benefit at the expense of another.

Detrimental Reliance in California Law

Detrimental reliance is a legal term in contract law where one party suffers harm or incurs a loss as a result of relying on the promises or representations made by another party. Detrimental reliance is a term that is often used to force a party to perform their obligations under a contract, under the theory of promissory estoppel.

Promissory Estoppel in California: Definition Element & Defenses

Promissory estoppel is the legal theory that a promise is enforceable by law, even if made without formal consideration. In California, the doctrine of Promissory estoppel is a lawsuit and argument raised when a person made a promise for which he did not receive any value or compensation, and which the promisee relied on by changing their position.

Breach of Contract Law in California

To recover damages from the defendant for breach of contract in California, the plaintiff must prove all of the following: (1) that plaintiff and defendant entered into a valid contract; (2) that plaintiff performed under the contract or that performance was excused; (3) that the defendant failed to perform under the contract; (4) that plaintiff was harmed; and (5) that defendant’s breach of contract was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s harm.

Understanding Discovery: Scope of Admissible Evidence

The term "Reasonably Calculated to Lead to Discovery of Admissible Evidence" defines the scope of permissible discovery in legal proceedings, focusing on information that could lead to trial-admissible evidence. The discovery process is applied liberally, allowing for a broad range of information, including hearsay, stipulated matters, and cumulative evidence, to be gathered.

Discovery Limitations in California

Learn the key restrictions on legal discovery in California with our concise guide on CCP-imposed limits. Learn how timing, scope, and protective orders shape the discovery process in California civil cases.

Right to Discovery in California: No Leave of Court

In California legal proceedings, most discovery procedures are available as a matter of right without requiring leave of court, except for certain sensitive matters such as physical and mental examinations, a defendant's financial condition in punitive damage cases, and a plaintiff's sexual history in sexual harassment cases, which require a court order.

Special Damages vs. General Damages: What’s the Difference?

General damages, including pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and emotional trauma, arise naturally from a wrongdoing and aren't quantified monetarily. In contrast, tort law's special damages, like car repairs or medical bills, are calculable and differ from general damages that lack a fixed cost.

Motion To Compel Arbitration

This article discusses the legal intricacies and procedures related to filing a motion to compel arbitration, covering topics such as tolling provisions, consolidation of arbitration proceedings, and appeals. The conversation provided a detailed overview of strategies for both enforcing and avoiding a motion to compel arbitration in various legal contexts.

Pleading the Fifth In A Civil Case

A defendant or witnesses in a civil case may plead the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The person pleading the fifth must show that there is a real possibility that the information sought can be use against them in a pending or future criminal case.

Mastering the Art of Trial Preparation: Trial Preparation Checklist

This article discusses strategies for legal teams, emphasizing meticulous evidence analysis, effective storytelling, and leveraging modern technology for case organization. It highlights the significance of detailed planning, from crafting compelling narratives to adopting trial prep software, ensuring every case aspect is methodically documented and presented.

Mastering the Courtroom: Essential Tips for Trial Lawyers

This article serves as tips for trial lawyers, offering valuable strategies for effective courtroom practice. It emphasizes the importance of meticulous preparation, persuasive communication, and strategic decision-making, especially when going to trial.

When does spousal privilege not apply?

Spousal privilege does not apply if 1) one spouse is charged with a crime against the other their children, 2) one spouse is suing the other, and 3) private communication between spouses is disclosed to other people.
By: Brad Nakase, Attorney

Of counsel

Of counsel is a title of a lawyer who has a close and continuous professional working relationship with a law firm that is not a partner or associate of the law firm.

Trustee and Beneficiary Conflict of Interest

A trustee has a conflict of interest when their interest conflicts with their responsibilities to the trust beneficiaries. A trustee may not put personal interest above the interest of the beneficiaries.

Fiduciary Responsibility Definition

A fiduciary responsibility refers to an organization that must put another person’s best interest first. A fiduciary duty is the highest standard of care in law. For example, a lawyer owes a fiduciary responsibility to the clients, a doctor owes a fiduciary duty to a patient, and a trustee owes a fiduciary duty to a beneficiary.

What Makes a Verbal Contract Valid

A verbal contract is valid when contractual elements are satisfied, such as evidence of an offer, acceptance of the offer, and consideration which is an exchange of value between the parties.

Is a Verbal Contract Legally Binding

A verbal contract is legally binding if it meets three requirements: 1) an offer was made, 2) the offer was accepted, and 3) there was a consideration which means something of value.

How to Enforce a Verbal Contract

To enforce a verbal contract, the verbal contract needs to be valid. The plaintiff must show that 1) an offer was made, 2) the offer was accepted, and 3) the plaintiff either paid money or took action that benefited the defendant.

Contact our attorney.

Please tell us your story:

0 + 7 = ?