Understanding Failure of Consideration for Lawyers

Failure of consideration occurs when one party does not fulfill their contractual obligations after a valid contract is formed. This can result in the other party receiving nothing or significantly less than what was promised. Unlike an absence of consideration, failure of consideration arises from events after the contract’s formation. It can justify rescission or termination of the agreement if the failure is material.

By Brad Nakase, Attorney

Email  |  Call (888) 600-8654

Have a quick question? I answered nearly 1500 FAQs.

What is meant by failure of consideration?

The term failure of consideration refers to a situation where one party to a contract fails to fulfill their agreed-upon obligations, causing the contract’s purpose or the exchange of value to collapse. This occurs after a contract has been formed with valid consideration, but one party does not perform or provide the promised goods, services, or payment. As a result, the other party may seek remedies for breach of contract based on this failure of consideration. It’s important to distinguish a failure of consideration from situations where there was never any consideration to begin with, as a valid contract must initially have some form of consideration to be enforceable.

Where a party to a contract fails to perform in accordance with the contract, or if the consideration he is required to give otherwise fails in whole or in part through his fault, the other party may invoke this failure as a basis for rescinding or terminating the contract, as long as the failure or refusal to perform constitutes such a material breach as to justify rescission or termination. (Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1306.)

In cases of anticipatory breach, the non-breaching party may assert a failure of consideration if they can demonstrate that the other party has clearly indicated their intention not to fulfill the contractual obligations. The difference between Anticipatory breach vs repudiation also becomes relevant when one party’s future performance hinges on the continuation of the consideration provided by the other side.

Example of failure of consideration

An example of failure of consideration would be a situation where two parties enter into a contract for the sale of a car. Let’s say Party A agrees to sell a car to Party B for $10,000. Initially, there is valid consideration on both sides: Party A’s promise to deliver the car, and Party B’s promise to pay $10,000. If Party A fails to deliver the car after receiving the payment, this constitutes a failure of consideration on Party A’s part. As a result, Party B would be entitled to remedies, such as a refund or damages, due to this breach of the contract.

If Party B anticipates that Party A will not deliver the car based on explicit statements or actions by Party A, Party B may claim an anticipatory breach of the contract. Here, the distinction between Anticipatory breach vs repudiation is crucial because Party B would need to establish that Party A’s conduct clearly indicated a refusal to perform, leading to a failure of consideration in the agreed contract.

What is meant by total failure of consideration?

Total failure of consideration occurs when a party to a contract receives none of the promised performance or benefits under the agreement. In this scenario, the non-breaching party does not receive the goods, services, or value that formed the basis of the contract, leading to a complete breakdown of the contractual obligations. Essentially, a total failure of consideration happens when the purpose of the contract is entirely defeated due to one party’s failure to perform.

For example, let’s say Party A pays Party B $5,000 in advance for Party B to build a website. If Party B fails to perform any work or deliver the website, this results in a total failure of consideration because Party A received absolutely no benefit in return for the payment. In such cases, Party A could claim that Party B’s complete lack of performance led to a total failure of consideration and seek remedies, such as rescission of the contract or recovery of the paid amount.

In cases involving an anticipatory breach, if Party B indicates in advance that they will not perform their obligations, Party A could argue that a total failure of consideration will occur due to the impending non-performance. Here, the distinction between Anticipatory breach vs repudiation can play a role, as it affects Party A’s legal strategy in handling the breach.

What is the difference between absence of consideration and failure of consideration?

The difference between absence of consideration and failure of consideration lies in the formation and subsequent performance of a contract. Here’s a detailed explanation that includes the term failure of consideration and addresses its context with anticipatory breach and Anticipatory breach vs repudiation:

  1. Absence of Consideration refers to a situation where no valid consideration exists at the time of the contract’s formation. Consideration is an essential element of a legally binding contract, involving a promise, an act, or something of value exchanged between parties. Without consideration, a contract is void or unenforceable from the beginning. For instance, if Party A promises to give Party B $1,000 without expecting anything in return, this is not a binding contract due to the absence of consideration. Since there was never an exchange of value, the contract never actually existed in a legal sense.
  2. Failure of Consideration occurs when valid consideration existed at the time of the contract’s formation, but one party fails to deliver the promised goods, services, or payment. Unlike absence of consideration, which prevents a contract from existing, failure of consideration means the contract was initially valid, but its essential purpose has been frustrated due to the lack of performance. For example, if Party A and Party B entered into a contract where Party A paid Party B for a product, but Party B never delivered the product, this is a failure of consideration.

In cases involving an anticipatory breach, the non-breaching party can claim that the anticipated non-performance would lead to a failure of consideration. In the context of Anticipatory breach vs repudiation, the issue is whether the anticipated actions or refusal by one party amount to a total refusal to perform, thereby leading to a situation where the promised exchange of value is not fulfilled, constituting a failure of consideration.

What is a plea of failure of consideration?

A plea of failure of consideration is a legal defense raised by a defendant in response to a claim for breach of contract. In this plea, the defendant argues that the contract’s consideration, which was a key element in the formation of the agreement, has completely or partially failed. Essentially, the defendant is asserting that they are not obligated to perform their contractual obligations because the consideration they were supposed to receive either was not delivered at all or was insufficient.

For example, if Party A sues Party B for non-payment of goods delivered, Party B could raise a plea of failure of consideration by asserting that the goods received were defective or not delivered as agreed. This defense suggests that Party B is excused from payment because the promised consideration—the delivery of goods—was not properly provided. A plea of failure of consideration challenges the plaintiff’s claim by highlighting the non-existence or inadequacy of the agreed-upon consideration.

In cases involving an anticipatory breach, if a party claims that there was an indication of non-performance, a plea of failure of consideration may be used to argue that the non-breaching party cannot be expected to perform their obligations due to the other party’s failure to provide the agreed benefits. This defense strategy is relevant when exploring Anticipatory breach vs repudiation, as the focus on consideration highlights the basis of the contractual obligations in dispute.

Is failure of consideration a real defense?

Yes, failure of consideration is considered a real defense in contract law. A real defense is one that challenges the fundamental validity of a contract or the enforceability of a contractual obligation. When a party raises a defense of failure of consideration, they are asserting that the agreed-upon exchange of value in the contract either did not occur or was fundamentally incomplete, thereby undermining the validity of the contract itself.

For instance, if Party A entered into a contract to receive specific services from Party B, but Party B did not perform any services as promised, Party A can claim failure of consideration as a defense against Party B’s demand for payment. This defense highlights that Party B’s non-performance effectively nullifies the obligation for Party A to pay under the agreement. The concept of failure of consideration becomes crucial in cases where one party claims that they have not received the benefit they were entitled to.

When dealing with an anticipatory breach, the non-breaching party can raise the defense of failure of consideration if they can demonstrate that the other party’s anticipated non-performance would result in a lack of the promised exchange of value. The analysis of Anticipatory breach vs repudiation often involves considering whether the threatened breach would lead to a total or partial failure of consideration, impacting the enforceability of the contract.

Is failure of consideration an affirmative defense?

Yes, failure of consideration is an affirmative defense in contract law. An affirmative defense is a legal argument that, if proven, can defeat or mitigate the plaintiff’s claim even if the plaintiff’s allegations are true. When a defendant raises failure of consideration as an affirmative defense, they are asserting that the agreed exchange of value in the contract was never received or that the other party failed to perform their contractual obligations, thereby invalidating the defendant’s duty to fulfill their part of the contract.

For instance, if Party A sues Party B for failing to make a payment under a contract, Party B could raise the affirmative defense of failure of consideration by showing that Party A did not deliver the goods or services as agreed. By establishing this, Party B would argue that their obligation to pay is excused due to the breakdown in the exchange of value.

In situations involving an anticipatory breach, the non-breaching party could use the defense of failure of consideration to demonstrate that their obligations should be discharged because the other party has indicated they will not perform their contractual duties. Understanding the distinction between Anticipatory breach vs repudiation is relevant here, as the defense may hinge on whether the other party’s actions amounted to a clear refusal to perform, resulting in a failure of consideration for the contract as a whole.

What are the three requirements of consideration?

Element 1: Failure to Execute a Promise

  • Definition of Failure of Consideration
    Failure of consideration occurs when one party does not fulfill a promise that was the basis for the other party’s performance. This can result from a willful breach of the promise. (Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Plaza Del Rey (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 221.)
  • Breach of Implied Promise
    A breached promise does not need to be explicitly stated in the contract. For example, even without an express contract, courts may imply a promise based on the circumstances, such as an implied promise by a university not to increase educational fees for continuing students. (Kashmiri v. Regents of University of California (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 809.)
  • Failure of Consideration as Grounds for Rescission, Not Voidness
    A failure of consideration differs from a lack of consideration in that it arises due to events occurring after the contract is made, which result in one party’s substantial non-performance. This condition does not render the contract void but provides grounds for rescission, remaining in effect until rescinded or terminated. (Civ. Code § 1689(b)(2))
  • Total Failure of Consideration
    A total failure of consideration happens when one party receives nothing of value from the contract. For instance, if a seller fails to transfer a deed to a real estate buyer who has already paid, it constitutes a total failure of consideration. (Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Plaza Del Rey (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 221.)
  • Delay in Performance is Not a Failure of Consideration
    A delay in performance does not amount to a failure of consideration unless the contract specifies that time is of the essence. If time is not expressly critical, the delay does not nullify the consideration. (Kreizenbeck v. Dan Gamel’s Rocklin Rv Ctr. (2011))
  • Partial Failure of Consideration as Grounds for Rescission
    A party can rescind a contract for partial failure of consideration, even if the opposing party has partially performed. (Galaz v. Oshita (2006))

Element 2: Breach Must Be Material

For a breach to justify abandonment of the contract, the promise must “go to the root of the contract,” so that a failure to perform it would render the performance of the rest of the contract different in substance from what was contracted. (Boston LLC v. Juarez (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 75.)

Requirements of a Material Breach: For a breach to be considered material, the plaintiff must have fulfilled significant obligations required by the contract. Additionally, the contract’s obligations should be dependent, meaning that the parties agreed that the failure to perform one key obligation would relieve the other party from their duty to perform. (CACI 303)

Willful Failure to Perform: A partial failure of consideration due to a willful failure by one party to perform a material part of the contract can justify rescission by the opposing party. (Dcm Constr. & Servs. v. Mohammadian (2010))

Example:
In a case where the defendant deliberately failed to correct property issues, resulting in breaches of the warranty of habitability and various statutory violations, this was deemed a material breach. (Shapiro v. Neman (2018))

Example:
If a defendant fails to start construction within a contractually required timeframe without excuse, this would be a breach justifying recovery of losses by the other party. (Hidden Glen Partners, LLC v. City of Napa (2016))

Lack of Economic Loss Does Not Render Default Immaterial: A default can still be deemed material even if the non-breaching party does not experience economic loss. For instance, an owner was justified in rescinding an exclusive listing agreement because the broker did not bring prospective buyers and made minimal efforts to advertise the property. (Coleman v. Mora (1968))

Delay in Performance/Time is of the Essence: A delay in performance is not automatically a failure of consideration unless the contract explicitly states that time is of the essence. In the absence of such a provision, delays do not invalidate the contract. (Kreizenbeck v. Dan Gamel’s Rocklin Rv Ctr. (2011))

Time is of the Essence Expressly Stated in Contract: If the contract explicitly states that prompt performance is vital, time is of the essence, and any delay in performance becomes a material failure of consideration. (Kreizenbeck v. Dan Gamel’s Rocklin Rv Ctr. (2011))

Time of Breach: The timing of the breach plays a significant role in assessing its materiality. A breach at the outset of performance may justify rescission, whereas a similar breach later in the contract might not be significant enough to warrant termination. When the breach occurs early, the court considers whether releasing the injured party from their obligations is more just. (Whitney Inv. Co. v. Westview Dev. Co. (1969))

Demand for Performance Necessary: When a contract does not specify a timeframe for performing an act other than paying money, a demand for performance is necessary to place the promisor in default. (Kirschenmann v. Bender (2014))

Remedies

Rescission
Failure of consideration in a material respect is a sufficient basis for a party to unilaterally rescind the contract. (Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Plaza Del Rey (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 221.)

Restitution
A claim for restitution may be based on unjust enrichment if the contract is void or rescinded due to failure of consideration. (Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Plaza Del Rey (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 221.)

Compensatory Damages
Under Civil Code section 1692, compensatory damages can be sought in breach of contract cases involving failure of consideration. For example, a court affirmed an award of damages when a seller failed to honor instructions to sell a residence, even though rescission was not granted. (Guan v. Hu (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 495)

Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.

See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment Law

Most recent blogs:

How to Trademark Your Business Name

How to Trademark Your Business Name

Protect your business name with trademark registration to ensure exclusive rights and safeguard your brand identity from infringement. Follow our step-by-step guide to navigate the trademarking process effectively while avoiding common pitfalls.

Service Charge vs Tip: Is the service charge the same as a tip?

A service charge is mandatory, and a tip is at the discretion of the customer.  Under California law service charges are not considered tips.  Service charges are the amount a customer is required to pay in addition to the beverages and foods purchased at a restaurant.  Service charges belong to the restaurant and not to the employees.

When Is a W-9 Not Required?

A W-9 is not required when payments to a vendor are under $600 in a calendar year. Payments made through credit card processors or platforms like PayPal also do not require a W-9.

Is Small Business Loan Secured or Unsecured

A secured loan places the burden of risk on the borrower. An unsecured loan shifts the burden of risk more to the lender. A small-business loan is secured when backed by specific collateral, typically business assets, such as equipment, inventory or real estate. Secured loans, including those secured by the Small Business Administration (SBA), typically range from $50,000 to $5 million. 

Where Can I Cash a Business Check?

Business check may be cashed at a check-cashing service: Walmart Money Center, Payday Advance, Ingo Money, Moneytree, Money Mart, ACE Cash Express, Speedy Cash, etc.
What Does Net Income Mean for Businesses and Individuals

What Does Net Income Mean for Businesses and Individuals?

Net income, often called "the bottom line," measures financial health by showing the remaining profit after expenses and deductions. For individuals and businesses, net income is a critical metric influencing budgeting, performance assessment, and decision-making.
What Is a Business Plan Executive Summary

What Is a Business Plan Executive Summary?

An executive summary in a business plan outlines your company's mission, market positioning, and financial projections in a concise format. It highlights key points to capture investors' interest, acting as a compelling introduction to your business plan.

Average Revenue For Small Business

Small businesses with no employees have an average annual revenue of $52,000. The average small business owner makes $73,000 a year. In general, the average revenue is around $52,000 per year for a company with a single owner/employee.
What Is the Legal Definition of False Advertising

What Is the Legal Definition of False Advertising?

False advertising involves untrue or misleading claims about products or services, violating laws enforced by the FTC and state authorities. Companies face legal consequences like fines, lawsuits, and cease-and-desist orders for deceptive practices under statutes like the Lanham Act and California's False Advertising Law.

Payment Upfront Meaning & 5 Tips for Getting Upfront Payments from Customers

Upfront payments can be beneficial to many small business owners. Upfront payments protect the owner emotionally and financially. There is no fear of customers disappearing without paying for products or services. It is also a great method by which to build trust with customers. It can also help improve cash flow, thereby letting the business grow and flourish.

How to Calculate Business Profit

A business profit is revenue minus expenses. The profit formula in accounting calculates the net gains or losses incurred by the business for a period by subtracting the total expenses from the total income: Total Income – Total Expenses - Profit
What Are the Benefits of Using a DBA (Doing Business As)

What Are the Benefits of Using a DBA (Doing Business As)?

A DBA (Doing Business As) name allows businesses to operate under a different name, enhancing branding flexibility and privacy. It is essential for opening business accounts, expanding services, and improving public perception without creating a separate legal entity.
How Can You Place a Vending Machine at a Location

How Can You Place a Vending Machine at a Location?

Learn the strategies for securing profitable vending machine locations and key factors to maximize your vending business's success. Discover top site recommendations, legal steps, and tips for approaching property managers effectively.
What Is the Legal Definition of Estoppel

What Is the Legal Definition of Estoppel?

Estoppel prevents a party from contradicting prior statements or actions, ensuring fairness and consistency in legal agreements. Common types include promissory estoppel, equitable estoppel, and estoppel by deed, addressing various legal scenarios effectively.
What Does Business Acumen Mean

What Does Business Acumen Mean

Business acumen involves strategic thinking, decision-making, and understanding organizational dynamics to impact goals effectively. Essential skills include financial insight, stakeholder awareness, and navigating uncertainty for leadership at all levels.

Contact our attorney.

Please tell us your story:

2 + 1 = ?