It is illegal for teachers and students to date, when the students are under the age of 18. Teacher–student relationships at primary and secondary schools are illegal regardless of the age of the student. When a student is 18 years old or older, most academic institution prohibit student and teacher romantic relationship.
By Brad Nakase, Attorney
Email | Call (888) 600-8654
Have a quick question? I answered nearly 1500 FAQs.
By legal definition, an adult is someone eighteen years and older. Despite this legal definition, California courts have consistently held that sexual relationships between a teacher and a student are illegal, particularly when the student is underage. However, complexities arise when examining situations involving students who are 17 years old or younger when the dating relationship begins, especially if the student later reaches the age of majority while still enrolled.
In California, the Supreme Court has ruled an educator’s sexual relationship with a student as “sexual misconduct with a minor,” even when the student is 18 years old. For example, in one case, an educator lost their teaching credential and pled guilty to coercion despite not facing jail time. This ruling underscores the legal and professional risks educators face when engaging in relationships with students, regardless of the student’s age.
A particularly high-profile case in California involved a high school teacher who left his spouse to live with his eighteen-year-old student. While the student openly expressed her love for the teacher on Instagram and during FaceTime calls, another victim came forward, revealing an affair with the same teacher in 1998 when she was only 17 years old. The teacher was subsequently charged with “oral copulation with a minor.” Following a plea deal that reduced his felony charge to a misdemeanor, he was required to register as a sex offender and sentenced to three years of probation. This case highlights the lasting consequences for educators who violate ethical and legal boundaries with their students.
More examples:
Former Ohio teacher sentenced for sex with student
Inappropriate Teacher Student Relationships in Texas
Tri-State teacher charged with having sex with student
Social Media and Digital Communication
The use of social media platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Snapchat has amplified the risks and visibility of teacher-student relationships. These platforms make it easier for teachers to engage in inappropriate communication and for students to document interactions. Digital evidence, such as inappropriate text messages or Instagram comments, often becomes critical in legal proceedings. In one instance, a teacher’s private messages on Facebook Messenger were discovered, leading to their dismissal and public scrutiny. Similarly, students involved in these relationships may face cyberbullying or public humiliation when the details become widely known.
At Home
Teacher-student sexual relationships can profoundly impact the student’s family life. Parents may feel betrayed and experience guilt for not recognizing the warning signs. This betrayal often strains familial trust and communication. For teachers, such relationships can lead to divorce or estrangement from their own families. For example, a teacher’s spouse might discover inappropriate messages on an iPhone or tablet, leading to irreparable damage in the marriage and custody disputes if children are involved.
In the Classroom
These relationships create a toxic environment for other students and faculty. Fellow students may perceive favoritism, which undermines the teacher’s authority and credibility. Classrooms can become divided, with peers taking sides or ostracizing the student involved. Teachers engaging in these acts often face immediate dismissal, leaving their students without continuity in instruction. For instance, an educator using Snapchat to communicate privately with a student might inadvertently expose the situation when screenshots circulate among classmates, leading to classroom disruption and broader school interventions.
Mental Health
The psychological effects on the student involved can be severe and long-lasting. Victims often experience feelings of shame, guilt, and confusion about the relationship. They may struggle with anxiety, depression, and trust issues in future relationships. Teachers, too, can suffer mental health consequences, including stress and legal anxiety, as their professional lives collapse. For example, a student who engaged in FaceTime calls with a teacher may later struggle with reminders of the relationship, impacting their ability to form healthy attachments.
Although it is not illegal for teachers to have sexual relationships with students over the age of 18, California law provides robust protections for minors against sexual exploitation in schools. Several key statutes illustrate these protections:
Teachers have a legal and ethical duty to provide a safe learning environment and protect students from harm. This duty extends to reporting suspected child abuse, including sexual misconduct, as mandated by California law. Teachers are considered mandatory reporters and must report any suspected abuse to the appropriate authorities within 36 hours of learning about it. Failure to fulfill this obligation can result in criminal penalties, including up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine, as well as civil liability.
Schools also bear responsibility for preventing child abuse. They must ensure that employees are aware of mandatory reporting laws, provide training on recognizing and addressing abuse, and enforce policies to protect students. Institutions that fail to uphold these responsibilities can face legal consequences, including lawsuits and financial penalties.
In addition to legal requirements, ethical considerations play a significant role in addressing teacher-student relationships. Many schools have instituted policies that prohibit such relationships, even when both parties are consenting adults. These policies aim to preserve the integrity of the educational environment and prevent conflicts of interest, favoritism, or perceptions of bias.
For instance, Stanford University’s ban on professor-student relationships reflects a commitment to maintaining fairness and equity within academic programs. The university’s policy states, “This policy highlights the risks in sexual or romantic relationships in the Stanford workplace or academic setting between individuals in inherently unequal positions; prohibits certain relationships between teachers and students; and requires recusal (from supervision and evaluation) and notification in other relationships.” Similar policies at institutions like San Diego State University reinforce the principle that educators must prioritize the well-being and academic success of their students over personal interests.
The legal, ethical, and professional standards surrounding teacher-student relationships in California are complex and multifaceted. While the state has robust laws to protect minors from sexual exploitation, gaps remain in addressing consensual relationships between teachers and adult students. In the absence of comprehensive legislation, educational institutions have taken the lead in establishing policies to safeguard students and uphold the integrity of their academic environments.
Ultimately, the responsibility lies with educators to adhere to the highest standards of professional conduct. By doing so, they not only comply with legal and ethical obligations but also contribute to a culture of trust and respect within the educational community.
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment Law
Most recent blogs:
Contact our attorney.