Gina Carano wins a legal step as a judge orders Disney to release Star Wars actor pay records in her lawsuit. The ruling requires certified spreadsheets covering The Mandalorian, Disney+ series, and upcoming Mandalorian & Grogu movie salaries.
By Brad Nakase, Attorney
Email | Call (888) 600-8654
Have a quick question? I answered nearly 1500 FAQs.
Gina Carano’s lawsuit against Disney has seen a significant victory when the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted a motion to force Disney to produce important documents pertaining to the compensation of other Star Wars actors, including well-known figures like Rosario Dawson, Pedro Pascal, and the cast of The Mandalorian & Grogu. The judgment follows 8 months of what Gina Carano called Disney’s “stalling & deflection” in her complaint alleging wrongful termination.
Disney must comply with the court order within twenty days by providing certified spreadsheets that detail the performers’ compensation across The Mandalorian, associated Disney+ series, and the future movie. The decision, which partially permits Carano’s request to compel, is a turning point in the ongoing conflict between the actress from Cara Dune and one of the biggest media companies in Hollywood.
The legal equivalent of declaring, “They are not providing us what they are supposed to,” is a motion to compel.
After what they say was eight months of Disney’s obstruction during the disclosure process, Carano’s legal team submitted this motion earlier on April 2.
To put it simply, her attorneys require exposure to Disney’s private data for a damages expert to determine how much Carano would have likely received had she not been sacked in 2021. In order to prove lost earnings, the court determined that Carano’s demand for Star Wars actors’ pay information was reasonable, pertinent, and essential.
The court approved Carano’s legal team on a number of important areas, even though it did not grant all of her requests in the Gina Carano Disney Lawsuit.
To put it briefly, this is not merely a small victory in the Gina Carano Disney case; if the expert feels that the initial batch is insufficient, it also opens the door to additional discovery.
The following must be turned over by Disney within twenty calendar days, except when both parties agree to other timeframes, according to the judge’s partial compulsion of Carano’s motion.
Documents Needed:
Carl Weathers’ real contracts for Seasons 1–3 of The Mandalorian must be turned over by Disney, with only personal or representative information redacted.
Disney must once more confirm the correctness of the spreadsheet that details the pay paid to any series actors who reprise their roles in the Mandalorian & Grogu film.
Additionally, if pay structures vary between series, Disney has to supply confirmed information (whether it’s in writing or by means of discovery) about how lead and secondary actors are paid across all shows of Star Wars Disney+, including The Mandalorian, Andor, Ahsoka, Obi-Wan Kenobi, The Acolyte, The Book of Boba Fett, and Skeleton Crew.
The judge rejected Carano’s claims for the budgets and earnings from the Star Wars television series and movies, as well as other actor contracts outside of Carl Weathers.
This door isn’t quite closed, though.
According to the court, Carano’s team may extend these inquiries after they reveal their specialist witness, but only if the specialist explains precisely how those numbers relate to their claims model and demonstrates that no alternative data could be used in its place.
Therefore, rather than being a shutdown, this was a purposeful denial.
There will be severe repercussions if Disney fails to meet the 20-day limit or attempts to delay once again.
The court has the authority to impose penalties on the business, such as fines or requiring Disney to reimburse Carano for time wasted. Additionally, the judge might take away Disney’s ability to protest further disclosures of information, which would allow Carano’s team to obtain even more internal information with less opposition. Disney might be found in contempt of court in the worst situation. That would seem terrible in the courtroom and in public, and it is the equivalent in law of prodding the bear.
More significantly, Disney would be seen as obstructive, maybe even guilty of concealing something if it didn’t cooperate. It would support Gina Carano’s Disney Lawsuit that her termination was discriminatory and targeted, in addition to being unreasonable.
This legal victory follows Carano’s criticism of Disney on Twitter for persistently treating her disrespectfully long after she was fired. Despite her pivotal role in founding mixed martial arts, she was completely erased from the sport’s past in the latest ESPN Women’s History Month homage.
When it comes to performers’ political and ideological remarks, Gina Carano additionally accused Disney of applying a double standard, stressing that other people in the company’s network have made even more contentious remarks without being fired.
Opponents of cancel culture, coerced corporate views, and the elimination of opposing viewpoints from entertainment have turned to the Gina Carano Disney lawsuit, which Elon Musk has provided with financial assistance.
The stakes have increased with this most recent court decision, and Disney’s customary “no comment” approach might not be sustainable for very long.
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment Law
Most recent blogs:
Contact our attorney.