What Is a Litigation Hold Letter?

A litigation hold letter instructs owners of certain documents or electronically stored information (“ESI”) to keep safe relevant evidence in the event of a lawsuit sometime in the future. A litigation hold may also be referred to as a “preservation letter” or a “stop destruction request.” These letters essentially tell the receiver that a lawsuit might occur in the future. The documents and ESI they list should not be lost or destroyed, because they may be relevant to that future lawsuit. You might see both “Litigation Hold Letter” and “Litigation Hold Notice” used. Don’t worry, they mean the same thing. They both refer to the requests that adversaries send each other to force the preservation of documents, or evidence.

By: Brad Nakase, Attorney

Email  |  Call 888-600-8654

It has become more and more common for relevant evidence to be destroyed, especially in the case of digital files. Failure to preserve ESI complicate lawsuits, leading to increases in cost and time. Punishment for destroying relevant evidence involves “discovery sanctions.” Discovery sanctions might result in the following actions:

  • Certain facts must be taken as true
  • The disobedient party is prevented from supporting or disagreeing with certain claims
  • Pleadings will be partly or wholly dismissed
  • A default judgment will be issued against the disobedient party
  • Fines will be issued against the lawyers and/or clients
  • Evidence might be excluded

What If I Don’t Receive a Litigation Hold Letter?

Different events may trigger a party’s responsibility to preserve certain documents and ESI. A Litigation Hold Letter is an obvious directive, meaning it very clearly orders a party to keep safe certain information. When it’s in writing, there’s little doubt!

Sometimes, however, the instruction to preserve documents and ESI may be more subtle. For instance, management at a company may be talking about harassment or a hostile environment. There may also be a government investigation into an organization’s finances. Even when the threat of a lawsuit is only implied, or otherwise not clear, that threat may still trigger the responsibility to preserve information.

How Do You Respond to a Litigation Hold Letter?

 First, it is important not to delay action. Even a delay of a few days may result in the loss or destruction of relevant evidence. Down the line, this may lead to harmful discovery sanctions. You and your lawyer should immediately set about protecting the necessary data.

If you receive a Litigation Hold Letter from an opponent, you should also respond in writing, telling the other party the steps you are taking to preserve the required documents and ESI. If you feel that the scope of their request is too broad, you may say so in your letter. This communication may prove helpful in the event of a future lawsuit. It means that your adversary must defend the framework of their request.

Depending on the Litigation Hold Letter you receive, and its scope, it may be difficult to know what information could be called relevant. You may wonder if you should go to the trouble of preserving everything, just to be safe. Fortunately, the courts have said the responsibility to preserve information is not unlimited. You are not required to preserve every single paper or email. The burden is on the other party to be specific in asking for documents, and not just saying “whatever is relevant.”

In the event of a Litigation Hold Letter, all key members of the receiving organization should be notified. They should also be reminded of the potential consequences of inaction. Consider all sources of data, including email, text messages, hard drives, laptops, etc. It is essential to have a good understanding of your company’s data organization so that you will know the location of various documents and ESI.

We want to hear your story.

1 + 6 = ?

Is a Verbal Contract Legally Binding

A verbal contract is legally binding if it meets three requirements: 1) an offer was made, 2) the offer was accepted, and 3) there was a consideration which means something of value.

How to Enforce a Verbal Contract

To enforce a verbal contract, the verbal contract needs to be valid. The plaintiff must show that 1) an offer was made, 2) the offer was accepted, and 3) the plaintiff either paid money or took action that benefited the defendant.

Is a verbal contract legally binding? How do you prove a verbal contract?

A verbal contract is legally binding and enforceable with several exceptions. A plaintiff can prove a verbal contract with witnesses and documents showing that the plaintiff took action related to the agreement, such as making payment or doing something that benefited the other party.

How Can Verbal Contracts Be Enforced

A verbal contract or oral contract can be enforced by a court when the plaintiff proves with witnesses or documents that an agreement was made and the plaintiff did something to his detriment.

How Do You Enforce an Oral Contract?

To enforce an oral contract, the aggrieved party has to file a lawsuit and show that an offer was made, the offer was accepted, the value was exchanged, and the aggrieved party has monetary damages.

Are Oral Contracts Enforceable in California?

Oral contracts are binding and enforceable in California. Although an oral contract is challenging to prove, an experienced business contracts attorney can easily prove the challenges.

Deceit Definition | Definition of Fraud

Deceit as defined is tortious fraud or deceit occurs when a party “willfully deceives another with the intent to induce him to alter his position to his injury or risk.” Civ. Code § 1709. Fraud has three meanings: 1) A person made a false promise, 2) A person conceal important facts, and 3) A person intentionally misrepresent an important fact.

Civil Battery California

California civil battery means any intentional, nonconsensual, and harmful or offensive contact by one person to another.

What is a Class Action Lawsuit?

A class action lawsuit is when multiple people who have been injured in a similar way by one person or entity file a joint lawsuit. By combining their powers and resources, they file a big lawsuit that attracts more attention and therefore is more likely to get a positive result than a number of single lawsuits.

Breach of Contract Law in California

To recover damages from the defendant for breach of contract in California, the plaintiff must prove all of the following: (1) that plaintiff and defendant entered into a valid contract; (2) that plaintiff performed under the contract or that performance was excused; (3) that the defendant failed to perform under the contract; (4) that plaintiff was harmed; and (5) that defendant’s breach of contract was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s harm.
© Copyright | Nakase Law Firm (2019)