An “emergency” exists if the driver of an authorized emergency vehicle is [insert one of the following]
- responding to an emergency call.
- involved in rescue operations.
- in the immediate pursuit of an actual or suspected violator of the law.
- responding to, but not returning from, a fire alarm.
- operating a fire department vehicle while traveling from one place to another place because of an emergency call.
Authorized Emergency Vehicle Exemption. Vehicle Code section 21055(a).
“Whether a vehicle is driven in response to an emergency call depends on the nature of the call received and the situation as presented to the mind of the driver and not upon whether there is an emergency in fact. The driver, of course, should have reasonable grounds to believe that there is an emergency.” (Gallup v. Sparks-Mundo Engineering Co. (1954) 43 Cal.2d 1, 5 [271 P.2d 34], internal citations omitted.)
A driver of an ambulance is permitted to ignore traffic signals if a siren is sounded, a red warning light is shown, and the vehicle is driven in response to an emergency call, provided the driver exercises due care and does not use the privilege arbitrarily. Cal. Veh. Code §§ 44(e), 454. Whether vehicle is driven in response to an emergency call depends on the nature of the call received and the situation as presented to the mind of the driver and not upon whether there is an emergency in fact. The driver should have reasonable grounds to believe that there is an emergency. Gallup v. Sparks-Mundo Engineering Co., 43 Cal. 2d 1
A driver of an ambulance specially constructed and maintained for emergency purposes is permitted to ignore traffic signals if a siren is sounded, a red warning light is shown, and vehicle is driven in response to an emergency call, provided driver exercises due care and does not use privilege arbitrarily. Gallup v. Sparks-Mundo Engineering Co., 43 Cal. 2d 1
Whether a vehicle is driven in response to an emergency call depends on nature of call received and situation as presented to mind of driver and not on whether there is an emergency in fact, though he should have reasonable grounds to believe that there is an emergency. Gallup v. Sparks-Mundo Engineering Co., 43 Cal. 2d 1
Brad Nakase, Attorney
AVVO Clients’ Choice Award 2019
Justia Highest Rating Honor 10
AVVO Highest Rated Lawyer 10
Frequently Asks Questions:
- What should you do after a car accident? Checklist
- How To Talk An Insurance Company’s Claims Adjuster
- Five Reasons Why A Personal Injury Lawyer Won’t Take Your Case
- How Do I Decide When To Hire A Car Accident Lawyer?
- When do I need to hire a car accident lawyer?
- How To Choose The Right Lawyer For Your Car Accident Case
- Starting a Car Accident Lawsuit
- Will I Get More Settlement Money With A Personal Injury Lawyer?
- California’s Statistics on Causes of Car Accidents
- Guide to Maximum Money Damages from a Car Accident Injury
- Guide to Proving Another Driver’s Fault in a Car Accident Lawsuit
- Guide to Reasons a Car Accident Lawsuit May Fail
- Guide to Under-insured Motorist Insurance Compensation
- 10 Things You Need to Know About Car Accident Discovery Disclosure
- 10 Things You Need to Know About Car Accident Money Damages
- 10 Things You need to Know about Accident Bodily Injury Settlement
Guide to Spine Injury
Other Accident Injuries